The Folly of My Phones: The 2019 Update

Back in the old days, in 2010, I wrote what would go on to be easily my most read blog post. No, it wasn’t some impressive warbling about Scottish Independence (for the record, I was still a No back then), nor was it some terrible tale of my working at Rock Steady - no, it was actually all about my mobile phones I’d owned throughout my short but expensive life.

Posted in May 2010, pre-iPhone 4 announcement, the list was intended to be a catch-all for my phones. The original post can be found here, and it is worth a wee gander.

Why the hell was it the most read, you are probably wondering? Well, when I used to use Google Analytics it was easy to find out that people were coming to my site for the images of the phones - namely, the Samsung Z105 and the Philips Savvy, of all phones. It was pure Search Engine Optimisation without me even knowing what the hell that was back then.

To this day it still appears in the top read posts, almost always found from searches.

I’ve always thought about going back and updating it, but it seemed churlish - I am not going for the clicks. So, to save the effort in case you didn’t click through the link up there, here’s the list.

Oh, and before we go any further - yes, the list is being added to in this very post! Yep, nine and a half years later. Timing.

The Original List - 2000ish to 2010

  1. Philips BT Cellnet Savvy

  2. Nokia 3210

  3. Sharp GX10

  4. Sharp GX10i

  5. Sharp GX20

  6. Nokia 6230

  7. Nokia 6230i

  8. Samsung D500

  9. Samsung D600

  10. Samsung Z105

  11. Nokia N80

  12. Nokia E65

  13. Nokia 6300

  14. Apple iPhone 3G

  15. Apple iPhone 4

  16. Apple iPhone 5

  17. Nexus 4

  18. HTC One (M8)

  19. Nexus 6P

  20. Samsung Galaxy S8

  21. Nokia 3

Note: I used for a while an HTC Desire X during repairs on my Nexus 6P. This is detailed below.

So that makes seven Nokia phones, including my current work horse, the Nokia 3. Four Samsung phones, and three Apple handsets.

Since the Original Post

So yeah, I went from iPhone 3G to the iPhone 4 as predicted in that 2010 post (this was when the iPhone 4 was yet to have officially been announced and was only taken from the now infamous Gizmodo iPhone 4 leak. I loved the iPhone 4, and it was replaced pretty obviously by the iPhone 5 in 2012 when it was launched.

But that would end my life with iPhones. The iPhone 5 was a fucking disaster. I went through five of them before giving it up. No one could explain to me what I was doing to them to break them - even the Apple Store people were absolutely stumped. I wrote about leaving the iPhone back when I did it, and it was… well, odd. A move I’d never regret - Android is my jam now.

I went with the mid-range and cheap Nexus 4, which was great. Just before Joni was born I went for the HTC One (M8) model, and wrote all about it here.

When I decided to move on from the HTC to the Nexus 6P, not only did I re-review the HTC One (M8), I wrote about the Nexus 6P at length.

The 6P died, in the end. I wrote the first part of a planned two-part series about upgrading from the Nexus to the Galaxy S8, but never wrote the second part - sorry! But the first part was good.

The Samsung was great, but I smashed it. I decided to move back to cheaper phones, so got a Nokia 3, which is where I am now. Ah well.

Hearing Again 2.0

Or Maybe That Should be Hearing 3.0…

In the summer of 2017 I was subjected to my first NHS hearing test as part of a drive I made to get it registered and changed with my GP. It lead, quite interestingly, to me getting a hear aid and, for the first time in maybe my life, hearing things properly. Who knew?

Since moving to Glasgow it has been a mild struggle to get my English NHS stuff translated to Scottish NHS, because the English system is paper based and as far as I can tell the two systems don’t talk well to each other.

In fact, Joni’s own medical records are still held here from when she was first born, whereas they never were in England. Either way, her vaccinations are constantly being questioned.

My hearing aid in England was a Phonak - and it was nice and flesh coloured (for me, admittedly). When I mentioned to the GP I needed to register has having one, they noted that they didn’t do that model here. When I eventually had my test this past week it was clear that my results were not going to be able to be compared to last years, because my records had not transferred.

My audiologist was happy that my hearing had got worse a bit, but not massively, and he did this by pulling the old profile off my hearing aid by plugging it into his computer. It was a clever thing to do, and good service, but after ten minutes he returned to be disappointed that they, in Scotland, couldn’t service my old hearing aid and it’d need to be replaced.

Hearing loss is categorised in two ways - volume and clarity. I have perfect clarity, but low power and need amplification. My old hearing aid was not powerful enough, and also had an open dome - what this meant was that my hearing aid was only doing part of the job - my ear was still hearing the sound around. In fact, the best option is for the new hearing aid to do all of the noise catching, so my new aid is more powerful, grey, and larger, but most importantly it blocks all sounds.

This is called a closed dome, and since I’ve started to get used to it, it is far more uncomfortable, but much much better at making me hear. In fact, the difference is pretty huge.

So that’s me, hearing better again, again. And that’s nice.

Back to A&E - A&E 5

I went to A&E again, this time after being a total donkey and falling down the stairs.

I have, after ten X rays, been diagnosed with a scaphoid fracture in the left wrist.

So there really isn’t a funny story this time - just foolishness and pain - so instead, here’s all of the other times I went to A&E.

A&E - This first instance had me catch a ball full in my face and suffer a dislocated jaw. This was not a barrel of laughs.

ER (A&E 2) - My experience of breaking my arm in Texas is chronicled here, and my thoughts on the US health system (a bit).

A&E 3 - After volleying the dog in the face by accident, I suffered a very badly bruised foot and hobbled around on crutches for a while, like a total doofus.

A&E 4 - This one is the most sobering - I spent the first half of 2017 in severe pain, an ended up in A&E after an ambulance ride, the first time in my life that had happened.

The Inclusivity Spiral

Hello. I am a cis-gendered white male. You can safely discount my opinion on this outright, so don’t worry. But as a cis-gendered white male, I am going to tell you my opinion anyway.

In a recent conversation with my wife we discussed gender fluidity and gender identity, along with the idea of sexual orientation. We came to the not unreasonable conclusion that, personally, if sexual identity hadn’t been so distinguished into one of three categories when we were children (those categories being straight, gay or bi) that it would have dramatically changed our lives.

Note: Bi wasn’t really an option in my upbringing mind you. If I’d kissed a man I’d have been gay,  no matter how many times I’d screamed that I was bi.

There was also this idea that if you “went” gay, you were always gay. Kiss a man, as a man, and you were gay, forever more. Nothing like this couldn’t be more apparent than when some of my close friends were coming out, and the idea was basically permeated that they couldn’t ever “go back in”, as it were.

This seems quite odd. These days, labels have become rods around which people hang certain ideals. They can be used powerfully to determine someone’s own identity, and also pejoratively as a way to cast them out. Someone who is gay is obviously then not straight, but then again maybe their explicitly saying their not straight deliberately - and so on. This is not an argument about what you personally identify with - I’m not in the business of saying you can’t call yourself something that you feel or believe you are and want to call yourself; that’d be batshit crazy.

Except, of course, that’s one of the biggest issues that the world is trying to grapple with.

One of the hottest topics that has permeated on Twitter is this idea of “TERFs” or Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists. Now, I could go on for hours and hours trying to explain this, but I am not fully qualified to do so (see my disclosure at the top of this post). Instead, I’m going to call it as I see it - these are people who are worried that transwomen (that is, men who have transitioned to be women, so we are clear) are invading spaces that should be “women only” (that is, women born biologically female). They believe that this is an affront to the progress that women have been making towards feministic equality.

The arguments are heated and deep, and also not for me to really talk about (see my disclosure at the top of this post, again). One thing I have noticed though is that it is not really approaching the idea of what the discussion should be about. In the other side of the argument, the idea is that a transwoman is a woman, and that’s something I agree with. I disagree with the TERF argument, for what it is worth (see my disclosure at the top of this post, again please) but the issue I have is that this isn’t the point. It’s like arguing what speed someone is driving at when the car is going in the wrong direction.

It is arguing on a dogmatic basis that the words and labels are the battleground; not the actual rights. See, transwomen have little rights, and almost zero equality or equanimity. So instead of arguing the battleground rules, maybe we should be challenging what purpose the labels actually serve? In time, like the slow move towards sexual orientation becoming a non-issue, so too will gender identity. Those who cling to the idea they are men, or women, or transmen or tranwomen, are having to do so in our society because they are coded that way - that’s the way that the world is, and has been, for years. Like my admission in my first opening salvo - if I had been told that as a kid men and women can fall in love with women and men in any order, combination, or any variation, in a panromantic way (that’s a new label, conjured because the old labels are bullshit) I’d have felt far more secure about feelings that I had about people when I was younger.

And that’s the take away I feel - I’m a man, yes. I have a dick and balls, yes. I am biologically a man and identify as such - I am cis, as in I identify as the biological sex I was given at birth. But as a man I am not the same as any other man - I’m not a stereotypical man, as my wife would attest to. I am a spectrum of feelings and emotions that are not set in stone and are certainly not defined by my penis. My privilege is of course (my curse, I know) but the idea that when I was younger any “feminine thoughts” were supressed for not being “manly” is the same social construct that affected my romantic and sexual feelings towards men and women.

I am not saying I am trans, nor gay - what I am saying is that the spectrum exists and it has to be considered the true battleground, not the archaic definitions of what men and women are. My only solace is that there is a generation of kids growing up who are not caring the same way I did about gender, love and relationships. They will hopefully understand that you will fall in love with a person, and their gender is really immaterial to love, and that they don’t feel any shame or pressure to disavow that love for anyone, and I feel that gender is something that will follow on from that as well.

The Spiral of the post’s title comes when people tie themselves in knots in the old defined labels. Take, for example, the use of “people who menstruate” rather than the word “women”. The argument against this is that you’re erasing women if you change the term to the more generic “people who menstruate”. You’re battling the idea that women are being excluded - deleted, if you will. And you’re right to be worried about that when you consider that every single women right up until maybe right now has been deleted or excluded.

But the issue comes that that are women who don’t menstruate. There are women who have gone through menopause, have had hysterectomies, and biologically don’t menstruate. Then there are transwomen who are women but don’t menstruate, and then there are transmen who do menstruate. So the spiral becomes that trying to be progressive about the term “women” it ends up actually becomes an excluding term.

That’s the spiral. And it’s caused by the labels that exist. And that's the battleground. Don’t play by the old rules, instead make better rules that work better for a future that sees everyone be treated better - and personally, call yourself what you identify as. But be respectful of what others thing and feel. 

Tim Hortons and the UK - A Long Overdue Review

Way back in 2016, it was announced that the awesome Canadian staple coffee shop was coming to the UK. I wrote about it wile salivating, thinking that it could be very unlikely to match the expectations I had of it. I wrote about things I thought that it had to be able to match, to make sure that it was a success in the overcrowded market that is the UK Coffee Chain land grab.

And, largely, Tim Hortons in the UK has managed it. Against all odds, it’s actually found a space in the market that it can largely manage to keep and maybe win in. Let’s take apart what I wanted and fill in the gaps.

Key to Tim's massive success in Canada is the coffee. The coffee is cheap, strong, and always ready. They don't grind the beans as you wait in line, they have pots brewed and kept warm, and are thrown away after 20 minutes on the hot plate. So this is what I thought was absolutely key - the coffee market is filled with bullshit Costa and Starbucks wankers taking hours over making the coffee in front of you. Did Tee Hos in the UK manage to beat this? No. Not really. In fact, the biggest issue is the ordering system - we will come to that - but in reality, the coffee should be a lot quicker and it is just sitting there. At least if you go for the basic brewed coffee. They also offer a raft of other types - Espressos and such - which makes a lot of sense knowing what they are up against. The coffee is, however, fucking perfect. Dark roast and all.

Additionally the price must pass over. I don't mean exactly the same price, but I mean at least in the same ball park. The price should be around £1 a small, which would undercut the places they're probably going to struggle to get traction against. As I speak, this is one of the places they are excelling at. The price of a small is around £1.29, and is £1.79 for a large. Boy oh boy that is good prices for what I consider to be the best high street coffee you can get in the UK.

They need are the range of doughnuts which I expect will pass over directly. The range of donuts (see, using the “correct spelling” now) is pretty solid. The main stays are mostly there - the Chocolate Dip, Boston Cream, Maple Glaze, Old Fashioned Glaze. The names are also the same, which is nice for ex-pats like Con and experienced cool guys like me. There is a weird choice - Apple Fritter for some reason is over. But the key one they were missing was Honey Crueller, which appeared shortly after the launch and is, by all accounts, a smash hit. Timbits made it too, but the range is quite diminished - the franchises in Canada all have their own wee spins on the Timbit and that is yet to really make it to the UK, but maybe one day it will.

Also the sandwiches, soups (chicken noodle better come over or they will feel the wrath of my wife). This is where we start to get into the bad things that the UK Timmies has. The food has, explicably, been modified into something very different. The sandwiches and wraps are a bit shit. In fact, it’s very terrible. The chicken wraps are tasteless and burnt and expensive and crap. And each meal comes with wedges that are probably a version of the fries/crisps you get at McDonald’s/Subway. It is a strange choice, and you can’t sub in a donut like you can in Canada.

The other thing they’ve fucked is the breakfasts. They are great on paper, but they haven’t managed to get the greasiness of the cheese or the heat of the sandwiches, but the big thing is that the sausage just doesn’t match it. Anytime I’ve had one I’ve been disappointed, which isa goddam shame - as Breakfast Sandwiches are my fucking jam in Canada.

What else? Loads. The ordering, as I mentioned, is poor. One teller takes the order and you are given a number and you have to wait. In Canada, sure you have to wait - but there is about ten times the number of staff working and as such it is so much faster. Despite having the coffee on the pot ready to go they have to take ages on the staff to get it ready to pour. What’s the point?

Also, £2 for a bagel and cream cheese? Mate. Maaaaaate.

Basically, getting a fix of Tims is brilliant, and now we can do it anytime we fancy really, and it won’t break the bank, and to be honest - that’s ideal. Ideal. My final point was a self-detead final sentence. Basically, it has an impossible set of expectations that us Canadian-coffee lovers will require it to meet. Instead, maybe they will focus on their expansion. I fully expect £2.20 coffees and £3 doughnuts. And i'll be sad.

Well, they didn’t. And I’m not sad. Jackpot.

Glasgow, Again

I haven’t written a blog post on here in over a month and a half. It has been for many reasons; Connie’s mom was here. My sister got married. I have been sleepy and tired. And, after three years in England, Connie, Joni, Etta and I moved back to Glasgow.

The decision to move is borne from a few different things; namely, our life in England was not working out when compared to the way that we felt when we were in Glasgow, and mostly it was because we wanted to live in the city again.

This won’t be news to you who are close to us. But the story is long and started way back in Late 2016.

But it’s not for posting on here.

What will change is the stories this blog will tell. And they are going to come thicker and faster than before.